Search found 129 matches

by hughesjr
2022/03/08 22:55:29
Forum: CentOS 7 - Security Support
Topic: missing arm64 packages fixing nss (CVE-2021-43527)
Replies: 2
Views: 1600

Re: missing arm64 packages fixing nss (CVE-2021-43527)

For whatever unknown reason, that update built on 12/4/2021 along with the other arches, but it was not released.

It has been pushed to the master server now and will be available on mirror.centos.org in 30 or so minutes.
by hughesjr
2022/02/14 13:44:49
Forum: 8 /8-Stream / 9-Stream - General Support
Topic: Boot fails after update ipmi_si No such device
Replies: 7
Views: 10392

Re: Boot fails after update ipmi_si No such device

The issue of "missing ipmi_si" is not the reason for the boot failure. This is an issue for sure, but whatever is happening next the boot sequence is causing your boot failure. To fix specifically the "ipmi_si No such device" error, you can blacklist the module and remove from your initrd image the ...
by hughesjr
2021/06/11 14:26:33
Forum: CentOS 7 - General Support
Topic: ibus-1.5.17-12 i686 updates are missing
Replies: 1
Views: 975

Re: ibus-1.5.17-12 i686 updates are missing

Thanks for the report. I have fixed this on our internal mirror and when I do the update release later today, the new ibus.i686 rpms will go out as well.
by hughesjr
2020/04/22 15:29:55
Forum: CentOS 7 - Security Support
Topic: sgabios SRPM in CentOS 7 Sources repo signed with VirtSIG instead of CentOS7 key
Replies: 2
Views: 768

Re: sgabios SRPM in CentOS 7 Sources repo signed with VirtSIG instead of CentOS7 key

OK .. i fixed this in the 7.8.2003 tree. It seems the virt sig also also built the same ENVR (they shouild not do that) .. and when moving during a point release we got the wrong srpm as they have the same name.

Once we release 7.8.2003 (in the next few days) it will be fixed.
by hughesjr
2019/07/09 16:00:40
Forum: CentOS Social
Topic: CentOS 8 AltArch (32-bit Intel)
Replies: 18
Views: 15028

Re: CentOS 8 AltArch (32-bit Intel)

We are not planing to release i386 for CentOS-8. There will be 32-bit multilib packages but not an i386 release. At least that is the plan and will be what happens at the beginning. As with anything else .. if enough people need this arch and if we can make it work, it could be possible in the futur...
by hughesjr
2019/03/27 12:56:23
Forum: CentOS 7 - Security Support
Topic: CESA for CVE-2019-5736 runc and docker updates?
Replies: 2
Views: 1505

Re: CESA for CVE-2019-5736 runc and docker updates?

We only announce updates for the Base repositories, not the extras repositories. runc and docker are in Extras.
by hughesjr
2019/01/08 21:23:04
Forum: CentOS 7 - Hardware Support
Topic: NVIDIA Optimus and bumblebee on Lenovo ThinkPad P51
Replies: 5
Views: 6819

Re: NVIDIA Optimus and bumblebee on Lenovo ThinkPad P51

I am looking at this info .. I want to use the NVIDIA drivers on the ThinkPad P51. It seems that the driving factor for the version you selected (NVIDIA-Linux-x86-390.87.run) and then also the same x86_64 version was it is the latest x86 32 bit version supported. Is that indeed the reason this versi...
by hughesjr
2018/12/04 20:02:00
Forum: CentOS 7 - General Support
Topic: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810
Replies: 16
Views: 9685

Re: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810

OK .. I kicked off the copy. In about an hour or so .. os/x86_64/ (updates, extras, etc.) will populate in http://vault.centos.org/centos/7.5.1804/

You can use it from there as long as you like.
by hughesjr
2018/12/04 19:57:44
Forum: CentOS 7 - General Support
Topic: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810
Replies: 16
Views: 9685

Re: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810

Let me go ahead and copy the 7.5.1804 tree into vault. then you can add that repo to your yum config
by hughesjr
2018/12/04 19:38:41
Forum: CentOS 7 - General Support
Topic: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810
Replies: 16
Views: 9685

Re: golang package missing from centos/7.6.1810

If you look, in the Red Hat repo you will see kernels from 7.0. CentOS does not have that either. If you wanted to use the 7.0 kerel, you would need to go to http://vault.centos.org/centos/ to get it .. it is the same for anything else that RH removed from their 'Current' tree. It was removed from 7...