Another stupid question...

A 5 star hangout for overworked and underpaid system admins.
Post Reply
RonB
Posts: 149
Joined: 2006/11/25 21:13:24
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Another stupid question...

Post by RonB » 2010/05/22 19:46:52

I'm just curious. Since CentOS 5.x is at 5.5 and we still have about four years of support for it, what happens if we get more than four new point releases? ... 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9 and... 5.95(?). I guess this probably won't happen as, after the release of 6.x, the point releases in 5.x will probably slow down, but still I'm curious about what would happen if this came up.

EDIT: Basically answered here... http://www.redhat.com/security/updates/errata/

I didn't realize that the seven years had three different "Production Stages." So 5's Stage 1 Production will end in less than a year. I guess it makes sense, the object is to get you to "ease" into the next major release as soon as possible.

User avatar
jlehtone
Posts: 4532
Joined: 2007/12/11 08:17:33
Location: Finland

Re: Another stupid question...

Post by jlehtone » 2010/05/23 05:58:55

9+1 == 10. 5.10 would follow 5.9.

User avatar
toracat
Site Admin
Posts: 7518
Joined: 2006/09/03 16:37:24
Location: California, US
Contact:

Another stupid question...

Post by toracat » 2010/05/23 07:12:10

Actually... something like 5.95 might be used as a 6beta. I remember CentOS 5 beta was published as 4.92 :-)

RonB
Posts: 149
Joined: 2006/11/25 21:13:24
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Re: Another stupid question...

Post by RonB » 2010/05/24 08:27:14

[quote]
jlehtone wrote:
9+1 == 10. 5.10 would follow 5.9.[/quote]

It turns out it was even a stupider question that I thought. DOH!

RonB
Posts: 149
Joined: 2006/11/25 21:13:24
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Re: Another stupid question...

Post by RonB » 2010/05/24 08:29:11

[quote]
toracat wrote:
Actually... something like 5.95 might be used as a 6beta. I remember CentOS 5 beta was published as 4.92 :-)[/quote]

Ah. Didn't know that. Even stupid questions can result in interesting information.

Post Reply