RTNETLINK answers: File exists

Issues related to configuring your network
Post Reply
suityou01
Posts: 18
Joined: 2014/08/13 15:30:49

RTNETLINK answers: File exists

Post by suityou01 » 2014/08/13 15:38:30

This is really puzzling. I build a Centos 7 server.

I'm in the process of installing zarafa. I got to the point of starting up the services and when I try and start the zarafa gateway service it fails.
Failed to start LSB: Zarafa Collaboration Platform's POP3/IMAP Gateway.
OK so I try and start the network service and I get :
Aug 13 16:35:07 myservername network[24431]: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Aug 13 16:35:07 myservername network[24431]: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Aug 13 16:35:07 myservername network[24431]: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Aug 13 16:35:07 myservername network[24431]: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Aug 13 16:35:07 myservername network[24431]: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Aug 13 16:35:07 myservername network[24431]: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Aug 13 16:35:07 myservername network[24431]: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Aug 13 16:35:07 myservername systemd[1]: network.service: control process exited, code=exited status=1
Aug 13 16:35:07 myservername systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: Bring up/down networking.
-- Subject: Unit network.service has failed
Bearing in mind this is a fresh install, and the network service hasn't worked since I built the machine on Monday.

This server has 2 ethernet ports so the configured interfaces are

em1
em2
lo

I have been googling all afternoon but really don't know what this error message means. Can anyone suggest how to go about trouble shooting?

"File exists" is just a bit too vague.

User avatar
TrevorH
Site Admin
Posts: 33219
Joined: 2009/09/24 10:40:56
Location: Brighton, UK

Re: RTNETLINK answers: File exists

Post by TrevorH » 2014/08/13 15:57:38

In my experience, "file exists" in network terms means "you have a duplicate route". Do you have route-$interface files? Or routes supplied by a DHCP server?
The future appears to be RHEL or Debian. I think I'm going Debian.
Info for USB installs on http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey
CentOS 5 and 6 are deadest, do not use them.
Use the FAQ Luke

Post Reply